Saturday, February 22, 2014

Taoist Sex: two dancing phoenixes

Shunga print of the two dancing phoenixes sex positionTaoist Sex is the ancient Chinese equivalent of Tantric Sex. But whereas Tantra is the Way of the Goddess, Taoist Sex is focused more on enhancing the health and longevity of the male participant. While the sexual positions of the Kama Sutra are designed to heighten and prolong the pleasures of the female , their Taoist equivalents are aimed more at the pleasure of the male. This is particularly apparent in the position illustrated here (in a Japaneseshunga print of the late eighteenth century), in which a man is copulating simultaneously with two female partners. In this position, called “two dancing phoenixes”, one female lies on top of the other, both spreading their legs so that their vaginas (referred to in Taoism as “yin gates”) are easily accessible to alternate thrusts of the man’s erect penis (“yang spear”).

The Kama Sutra size chart

Size of lingam and yoni according to the Kama Sutra
























According to theKama Sutra, men can be classified on the basis of the size of their penis, or lingamas it is called in Sanskrit. A person with a small penis is described as a hare-man, one with an average-sized penis is described as a bull-man, and one with an abnormally large penis is described as a horse-man. Similarly, females can be classified according to the size of their yoni, or vagina. A woman with an unusually small yoni is called a deer, one with an average-sized yoniis a mare and one with an unusually large yoni is an elephant. TheKama Sutra identifies nine types of sexual union, based on each of the three lingam types copulating with each of the three yoni types.

Friday, February 21, 2014

Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013

Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013


CPM ( Cost Per Impression ) ad networks pays publishers as per thousand impressions. CPM ad networks pays to you also if your visitors not clicked on any ads.
Its best to use CPM ad network if your blog/website generating large amount of page views per day. You can earn more money by placing CPM ads if your blog has large number of page views than CPC ads.
1. Google Adsense :
google adsense 300x146 Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013
Google Adsense is CPC network. But also they display some CPM ads. Means you can get money for clicks and impressions.
You can read more about Google Adsense here.


2. Epom Market :
Epom Market TechUseful Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013
Epom Market is an international ad-network that unites top quality Publishers with direct Advertisers. Epom Market partners with leading advertisers and publishers in more than 40 different countries and 15 different verticals.
Epom pays on time. I personally used Epom and found its best and highest paying network on the net. They pay on monthly basis and minimum payout is $100. Their support staff is also helpful. They reply to your query within 24-48 hours normally. Epom pays highest eCPM rates. Epom updates its stats daily.
I strongly recommend you to try Epom market.



3.  Ads Bytes :


Ads Bytes is one of the top high paying ad networks on the net. Ads Bytes offers wide range of ad formats. Ads Bytes pays net 45 and their minimum payout is $50. You can also block some ads if you don’t want to display. 
Strongly recommended adsbytes.com as their high payout.



4 Casale Media :
l Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013

Casale Media offers good CPM rates. Their support is also good. You can earn more if you use their popunders.  Casale Media pays monthly and their minimum payout is $25.




5. ValueClick Media :
logo 1 Top 5 Highest Paying CPM Ad Networks For Publishers 2013

ValueClick Media is one of the top ad networks in the industry. They offer wide range of ad formats. You have complete control on ads so you can choose which ads to show on your site or not. Their support staff is also good.
ValueClick Media pays on monthly basis and their minimum payout is $100.

Pay Per Click vs Pay Per Impression


Choosing between PPC vs CPM Banners Ads

PPC and CPM, no these aren’t colleges about to face each other on the field. PPC (pay per click) and CPM (cost per thousand) are two methods for paying for banner ads. Each one has it’s place in an effective campaign, in fact I’d go so far as to say that nearly any online campaign should utilize them both. In this post we’ll explore the reason’s why you should consider them both for your online marketing plan.

Introducing the contenders
PPC, or pay-per-click, means that each time a person clicks on your ad you will pay a predetermined amount. This model makes up the majority of Google Adwords ads. The nice thing about it is you are guaranteed a set number of traffic for a set price. In other words if you say you want to pay one dollar per click and you set a budget of 1000 clicks, you will get no more than 1,000 clicks and will pay no more than $1,000 dollars. Of course that can also be viewed as a weakness. You will not get more than 1,000 clicks because once your budget is spent, your ad disappears until the next cycle.
CPM, or cost per thousand, is based on impressions, or views, of the banner. Generally the pricing is based on increments of 1,000 impressions. You are guaranteed that your ad will be displayed on the web page a visitor sees. The benefits of this model are that a banner will be seen a set number of times, the drawback is that you can’t absolutely guarantee an exact number of hits to your website.

Common Misunderstanding
Over the years I’ve encountered many people, even among professional online marketing people, that write off CPM completely. They say that since PPC has a guaranteed flow of traffic that there is no reason to use CPM. The most important common feature of both methods is that their purpose is to drive traffic to your site. Click Through Rate (CTR) then becomes the most important tracking number for us to look at. For the sake of this example, we’ll also assume that basic research has been conducted correctly and that the ads are being placed on websites which are frequented by your target audience. Across all industries the average CTR for banner ads currently sits at 0.9%, for easy math we’ll just round that up to 1%. The average cost per click in PPC is $0.89 and the average CPM is $0.24. We’ll set our CTR goal at 1,000 for the example.
We’ll start with PPC. The math here is very simple, for 1,000 clicks you’ll pay $890. Based on the industry average of a 1% CTR you know that if you have 1,000 clicks, then your ad displayed approximately 100,000 times.
Next comes CPM. In order to hit your target of 1,000 clicks you’ll buy 100,000 views at the average price of $0.24 per thousand. If you multiply 100,000 by $0.24 per thousand you find that you will pay $24 to get the same number of views and clicks as a PPC campaign
Here’s a handy table to make it easier to see the comparison:




Knock Out Punch?
Suddenly CPM doesn’t look so bad, right? So, why don’t I tell you to stop using CPC altogether? There are two main reasons, first, not all industries perform as well as others as far as CTR is concerned. Second, some sites only allow for small text ads to display which historically have a much lower CTR than banners that allow images or rich media (animation, sound, etc.)
Boil it down


After everything is said and done, you should choose the ratio of your PPC and CPM after researching your industry’s performance and costs in each. Research the sites on which the ads will run to make sure they are visited by your target audience. If you find yourself getting stuck on the research part or in deciding what ratio you should be using get in touch with me for a consulting session

PAYING THE DENTIST

I can’t tell whether this dentist offers an unusually broad array of services, or whether he’s just flexible about the payment methods he accepts:




There are hints at the bottom of this image that it’s been cropped from a larger scene that includes a scroll and likely a caption. But I couldn’t turn up the uncropped picture, nor any attribution. Does anybody recognize the artist from that distinctive-looking style?